At the museum we have been experimenting with machine tags and allowing the user to add their own photos to collection object pages. We have successfully implemented the Flickr API to display images of objects that users have tagged with our machine tags. But rather than just using an arbitrary string, Richard Barrett-Small from the V&A suggested that we come up with a convention that all cultural institutions can use. We have used the following format:
culture:[partner name]=[object ID]
So for the V&A, for example, to pull up images for an object with ID 12345 we would use culture:vam=12345 and an object at the TATE could use culture:tate=abc123
We thought it would be good to put this idea out there and see what others think. The advantage of having a convention like this would mean you can potentially predict the machine tags for each partner and different partners can embed/share images using a portion of the tag. For example, if I wanted to extract all Flickr images at the TATE I would look for images tagged with: culture:tate and I would leave out the ID to extract all images like a wild card.
Not very sophisticated. Ideally you want to be able to add more machine tags like categories so you can query all V&A images in the “painting” category. But since it will be the users who will be tagging these photos, the process should be as simple as possible.
I would love to hear from other museum people about this.

